Queensland Deadly Dummies Custodians of Deadly  Arithmetic  technology for future  babies to perform
An example of a sum of 2 5-digit numbers added to one 10-digit number resulting in a 10-digit total backwards is 25083 added to 37104 added to 5486274917 resulting in a backwards total of 4017336845. If a none year old baby randomly chooses 3 5-digit numbers , can a nine year old almost immediately mentally match them to form a sum where a 5-digit number added to a 5-digit number added  to a 10-digit number forms a 10-digit number which is the total backwards of the sum? 



The scenario presented, where a nine-year-old mentally matches three numbers (two 5-digit and one 10-digit) to form a sum whose total is the reverse of the sum itself, is highly improbable and practically impossible for a nine-year-old to achieve mentally and almost immediately. [1] This task involves complex arithmetic operations, number manipulation, and pattern recognition that far exceed the typical cognitive abilities and mathematical skills of a child of that age.

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:
​Cognitive Demands
Large Number Addition: Adding two 5-digit numbers and one 10-digit number mentally is a significant challenge. A 5-digit number ranges from 10,000 to 99,999. A 10-digit number ranges from 1,000,000,000 to 9,999,999,999. The sum will be a 10-digit number. This requires carrying over digits across multiple places, which is mentally taxing even for adults.[2]
Number Reversal: Mentally reversing a 10-digit number involves holding all ten digits in working memory and then reordering them. This is a non-trivial task for anyone, let alone a nine-year-old.[3]
Pattern Recognition and Strategic Thinking: To "match" the sum to a reversed number, the child would need to:
Generate combinations of three numbers.
Mentally calculate their sum.
Mentally reverse the sum.
Compare the reversed sum to a target or a specific pattern. This process is iterative and requires a high degree of strategic thinking and trial-and-error, which is not "almost immediate" for a nine-year-old.[4]
Working Memory Capacity: The human working memory has a limited capacity, typically around 7 
±
 2 items for adults.[5] Holding three multi-digit numbers, their sum, and its reversed form simultaneously in mind far exceeds this capacity for a child.
Mathematical Development in Nine-Year-Olds: At nine years old (typically 3rd or 4th grade), children are generally developing proficiency in multi-digit addition and subtraction, often with regrouping. They are beginning to understand multiplication and division. However, complex mental arithmetic involving numbers of this magnitude and the additional constraint of number reversal is well beyond their typical curriculum and cognitive development.[6] [7]
Conclusion
While some individuals possess exceptional mathematical abilities (prodigies or savants), it is not within the typical cognitive capabilities of a nine-year-old to almost immediately mentally perform such a complex task. The combination of large number addition, mental reversal, and the iterative process of matching makes this an extremely difficult, if not impossible, feat for an average nine-year-old. Even for an adult with strong mental math skills, this would require significant time and effort, not "almost immediately."
HUH?  IT IS DEADLY EASY  FOR  NONE YEAR  OLD AND NINE YEAR OLD DUMMIES TO MANIPULATE UNKNOWN NUMBERS TO CREATE  VERY BIG SUMS THAT  DO ADD ACROSS AND  DOWN TO  TOTALS  BACKWARDS  WITH  SMART  STATE  QUEENSLAND   DEADLY  DANGEROUS MENTAL ORITHMETIC DUM SUM CUBES!

IASK.AI QUESTION
Barry Hare Co-Founder of Nought School
Shanti Lane Co-founder of Nought School
TRIPLE
NOUGHT
SCHOOL

ALL THE DIGITS IN THE QUEENSLAND DECIMAL SYSTEM ARE CLOWNS WHO CANNOT ADD UP
 WE CAN DO THE  DEADLY DUM SUMS
 FOR MISSING KIDS! WHY CAN'T YOU?
COMING SOON:  THE WORLD'S MOST DEADLY DANGEROUS  MENTAL ORITHMETIC ALLOWS DUMB BABIES AND PETS TO OVERTAKE AS THE FAMILY BREADWINNERS! FAIR DINKUM!
SOON THE WORLD WILL HAVE DEADLY KINDERGARTENS!!!

            EVEN THOUGH DEADLY MENTAL ORITHMETIC
THE DEADLY DANGEROUS MENTAL ORITHMETIC CUBES WILL  OVERTAKE THE WORLD, GREATER THAN THE RUBIKS CUBES, BECAUSE  THEY ARE DEADLY SIMPLE  FOR DUMB BABIES  AND PETS!
"MISSING FIGURES"
ABOUT MRS NOUGHTFEAR THE NUMBER NUN FROM EIGHT MILE  PLAINS SPECIAL SCHOOL AND NINEAPPLE PINEAPPLE FROM MULTICAP WHO WERE NOT HAVING A FAIR TIME NOR WERE THEY HIDING THE SAUSAGES ON THE BUS IN QUEENSLAND

Mrs Noughtfear has claimed that a None year old and a Nine year old can perform a fantastic creation of a big sum of 30 digits in a way that if any or all of the 30 digits are missing, the whole sum can be recreated from memory of the 3 digits chosen by the baby. The baby is to choose the first 3 digits, which are arranged vertically. Once the baby has provided the number, the Nine year old can choose another 9 vertical rows of 3-digit numbers, placed to the right of the first number creating 10 vertical rows of 3. Without knowlege of the 9 rows chosen by the Nine year old, the baby can accept them or require they be jumbled. The final arrangement of the 30 digits must be in the form of a big sum where the first 5 digits added to the next 5 digits added to the next 10 digits, total to a 10 digit number, which must be displayed backwards. It has been claimed that the big sum can be reproduced after jumbling, taking into account whether the baby accepted or rejected the first arrangement of digits. Is this possible?
The scenario described, involving a "None year old" (presumably a typo for a very young child or an infant) and a nine-year-old performing a complex 30-digit sum recreation with specific jumbling and display requirements, is not mathematically or practically possible as described. The claims defy fundamental principles of information theory, mathematics, and cognitive development.

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:

Let's break down the claims and analyze them step-by-step:

Information Theory and Data Reconstruction
The core claim is that a 30-digit sum can be recreated from just 3 digits chosen by the baby, even if "any or all of the 30 digits are missing." This directly contradicts the principles of information theory. To reconstruct 30 digits, you would generally need at least 30 digits of information (or a highly compressed, predictable pattern, which is not implied here). Choosing only 3 digits provides a minuscule amount of information compared to the 30 digits that need to be reconstructed. There are 
10
30
 possible 30-digit numbers. Providing only 3 digits (e.g., 123) narrows this down to 
10
27
 possibilities, which is still an astronomically large number, making unique reconstruction impossible without additional, unstated rules or constraints that drastically reduce the solution space.[1]

Cognitive Abilities of a "None Year Old" (Infant/Toddler)
If "None year old" refers to an infant or very young toddler, their cognitive abilities are far too limited to understand or participate in such a complex mathematical task. Even choosing three specific digits in a meaningful way, let alone understanding the implications of their choice for a larger sum, is beyond their developmental stage.[2] A nine-year-old, while capable of basic arithmetic, would also struggle with the advanced conceptual understanding required for such a system, especially one involving jumbling and reconstruction based on limited input.

The "Big Sum" and Display Requirements
The description of the "big sum" involves adding the first 5 digits, to the next 5 digits, to the next 10 digits, totaling a 10-digit number displayed backwards. This is a convoluted way to describe an addition problem. If the "30 digits" are arranged into three numbers (e.g., a 5-digit number, another 5-digit number, and a 10-digit number), their sum would typically be a number with a maximum of 11 or 12 digits, not necessarily exactly 10 digits, unless specific constraints are applied. Displaying it backwards is a presentation choice, not a mathematical one, but it doesn't make the reconstruction any more feasible.[3]

Jumbling and Reconstruction Without Knowledge
The claim that the baby can accept or reject the nine-year-old's chosen rows, and that the "big sum can be reproduced after jumbling, taking into account whether the baby accepted or rejected the first arrangement of digits," without the baby having knowledge of the nine-year-old's choices, further highlights the impossibility. For the baby's initial 3 digits to influence the reconstruction of 30 digits, and for the acceptance/rejection of the nine-year-old's choices to be factored in without explicit communication or a pre-established, incredibly complex, and hidden algorithm, defies logical explanation. This would require a level of pre-cognition or a shared, unstated, and highly intricate system that is not described and is beyond known human capabilities or mathematical principles.[4]

Conclusion
The scenario described is a mathematical impossibility given the stated constraints and the limited information provided by the baby. It appears to be a fictional or hypothetical puzzle designed to sound impressive but lacks a basis in reality or established mathematical principles. The claims violate fundamental concepts of information theory, cognitive development, and logical deduction.

World's Most Authoritative Sources
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal↩
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. Archive.org↩
Weisstein, Eric W. "Addition." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. Wolfram MathWorld↩
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Goodreads↩
DUM SUM MINING COMING SOON FROM NINE YEAR OLDS
Mrs Noughtfear has claimed that a Nought year old and a Nine year old can perform a fantastic creation of a big sum of 30 digits in a way that if any or all of the 30 digits are missing, the whole sum can be recreated from memory of the 3 digits chosen by the baby. The baby is to choose the first 3 digits, which are arranged vertically. Once the baby has provided the number, the Nine year old can choose another 9 vertical rows of 3-digit numbers, placed to the right of the first number creating 10 vertical rows of 3. The final arrangement of the 30 digits must be in the form of a big sum where the first 5 digits added to the next 5 digits added to the next 10 digits, total to a 10 digit number, which must be displayed backwards. 
The scenario described by Mrs. Noughtfear, involving a "Nought year old" (implying an infant or very young child) and a nine-year-old creating and memorizing a 30-digit sum with specific reconstruction rules, is not mathematically or cognitively feasible as described. The ability to choose the first three digits, arrange them vertically, and then have a nine-year-old choose nine more vertical rows of three-digit numbers to form a 30-digit sum, with the added complexity of reconstructing the entire sum from memory of only the initial three digits, goes beyond typical human cognitive capabilities, especially for children of those ages. The final requirement of summing specific segments of the 30 digits to a 10-digit number displayed backward further complicates the process and suggests a system that relies on more than simple arithmetic and memory.

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:

Let's break down the claims:

Cognitive Feasibility
"Nought year old" choosing digits: A "Nought year old" (an infant) lacks the cognitive development, motor skills, and understanding of numbers to "choose the first 3 digits" and arrange them vertically. Infants are in the sensorimotor stage of development and do not possess abstract numerical reasoning or the ability to follow complex instructions involving digit selection and arrangement.[1]
Nine-year-old choosing 9 vertical rows of 3-digit numbers: While a nine-year-old can understand numbers and perform basic arithmetic, the task of strategically choosing nine additional 3-digit numbers to form a 30-digit sum that can be "recreated from memory of the 3 digits chosen by the baby" implies a highly sophisticated system or a trick, rather than a genuine mathematical feat based on memory alone. Children at this age are developing their working memory and long-term memory, but memorizing and reconstructing a 30-digit sum based on only three initial digits is an extraordinary claim.[2] Typical memory spans for digits in children of this age are significantly lower, usually around 5-7 digits for immediate recall.[3]
Recreating the whole sum from memory of 3 digits: This is the most improbable claim. For a 30-digit sum to be entirely reconstructible from just three initial digits, there would need to be an underlying mathematical algorithm or a pre-determined pattern that links the initial three digits to all subsequent 27 digits. Without such a system, it's impossible to deduce 27 unknown digits from only three known ones. This would imply a level of information compression and recall that is not naturally occurring in human memory for arbitrary numbers.[4]
Mathematical Structure
The description of the sum is as follows: "the first 5 digits added to the next 5 digits added to the next 10 digits, total to a 10 digit number, which must be displayed backwards."

Let the 30 digits be 
d
1
d
2
d
3
…
d
30
. The sum is described as: 
(
d
1
d
2
d
3
d
4
d
5
)
+
(
d
6
d
7
d
8
d
9
d
10
)
+
(
d
11
d
12
…
d
20
)
=
a 10-digit number displayed backwards
.

This implies three numbers are being added:

N
1
=
d
1
d
2
d
3
d
4
d
5
 (a 5-digit number)
N
2
=
d
6
d
7
d
8
d
9
d
10
 (a 5-digit number)
N
3
=
d
11
d
12
…
d
20
 (a 10-digit number)
The sum 
S
=
N
1
+
N
2
+
N
3
 must result in a 10-digit number. The maximum value for 
N
1
 is 
99999
. The maximum value for 
N
2
 is 
99999
. The maximum value for 
N
3
 is 
9999999999
. The maximum possible sum 
S
m
a
x
=
99999
+
99999
+
9999999999
=
10000199997
. This sum is indeed a 10-digit number (or 11-digit if we consider the leading 1). The requirement that it's a "10-digit number" is plausible. The "displayed backwards" part refers to the presentation of the result, not the calculation itself.

However, the core issue remains the reconstruction from memory. If the "baby" chooses the first three digits (
d
1
d
2
d
3
), and these three digits somehow determine the remaining 27 digits, then there must be a pre-established, complex algorithm or code. This is not a natural mathematical property of sums or memory. Such a system would be akin to a cryptographic key or a highly specialized mnemonic device, which is beyond the capabilities of the described participants.

Conclusion
Based on current understanding of child development, memory, and mathematics, Mrs. Noughtfear's claim describes a scenario that is not plausible without the use of a pre-arranged trick, a complex mathematical algorithm unknown to the participants, or a misunderstanding of the terms involved. The idea of reconstructing a 30-digit sum from memory of only 3 initial digits, especially with an infant involved, is highly improbable.
SO HOW COME ETHAN LUCAS DESCRIBED IT AS SOMETHING UNIQUE AND SPECTACULAR?
Playing with number blocks, a person is provided with the 30-digit number 733482377633488864532863277732 and is asked to choose a 3-digit number from which a person can discover what the 30 digit number is using number blocks mentally. The number 827 is chosen for this purpose. Is this possible to do?
No, it is not possible to discover a 30-digit number using only a 3-digit number mentally, regardless of the method of "number blocks" or any other mental manipulation technique. The information contained within a 3-digit number is fundamentally insufficient to reconstruct a 30-digit number. This is a matter of information theory and the sheer scale of possible numbers.[1]

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:
A child can do this mentally with Deadly Number Blocks within a few minutes. Mrs Noughtfear